Even in Canada, Kids Are Suing the Government Over Climate Change

“We demand that our rights and those of future generations be protected and respected.”

A resident is evacuated from the flooded Montreal borough of Pierrefonds in May 2017.Catherine Legault/AFP/Getty Images)

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

This story was originally published by National Observer and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

A network of young people in Quebec have applied to sue the Canadian government for failing to get tough on the carbon pollution that is heating the planet and putting their futures in jeopardy.

Environnement Jeunesse applied Monday to bring a class action lawsuit against the Government of Canada, on behalf of all Quebecers aged 35 and under. The group is being represented pro bono by Montreal-based law firm Trudel Johnston & Lespérance.

Canada is infringing on the fundamental rights of these young people, the group alleged—rights that are protected by both the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.

A Quebec Superior Court judge will now have to decide whether to authorize the class action before the group can move forward with a trial, Anne-Julie Asselin, a lawyer at the firm, told National Observer. She expected that this step would take about a year.

The moves comes after thousands of Quebecers mobilized to demand measures to fight climate change, like halting all new fossil fuel exploitation in the province.

Canada expected to miss even weak targets

The world must drastically cut its emissions each year, until they are roughly half of 2010 levels by 2030, in order to avoid damage to ecosystems and irreversible changes to the climate, according to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

That means emissions in Canada will have to be cut by hundreds of millions of tonnes a year, to about 385 million tonnes, according to a calculation by the Canadian Press.

The Trudeau government is moving to implement a price on pollution nationwide, and has undertaken several other measures to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions like moving to tighter building codes and investing in green transit infrastructure to take cars off the road.

But Ottawa’s official carbon pollution reduction target—cutting emissions 30 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030—is only projected to hit 512 million tonnes, which is above the IPCC number. Plus, a 2018 report to the UN showed the country will miss even this target without stricter measures.

“Instead of accelerating a green transition, Canada is subsidizing oil companies and purchasing a pipeline in our name,” said Environnement Jeunesse executive director Catherine Gauthier, in a press release from the group.

“We demand that our rights and those of future generations be protected and respected. We demand that Canada act without delay to avoid dangerous global warming, above 1.5 degrees Celsius, as recommended by the IPCC.”

Similar legal actions ongoing around the world

The group is hoping to emulate the success of the Urgenda Foundation campaign in the Netherlands, whose case forcing the Dutch government to accelerate its emissions cuts was upheld in a Hague court last month. The severity of the climate crisis demands that the cuts be deeper, judges there ruled.

“Similar legal actions are ongoing in the United States, Belgium, Norway, Ireland, New Zealand, Switzerland, Colombia and the United Kingdom,” the law firm notes on its web page detailing the class action.

The firm has pointed to several examples of how weak climate targets infringe on rights in Canada. The right to life, integrity and security of the person, for example, is protected by section 7 of the federal charter and section 1 of the Quebec charter.

As well, the right to equality is protected by section 15 of the federal charter and section 10 of the Quebec charter, and the right to live in a healthful environment in which biodiversity is preserved, is protected by section 46.1 of the Quebec charter.

Quebec judge will now decide on authorization

Asselin from Trudel Johnston & Lespérance said at this point there was no date yet for a hearing or a decision on whether the suit can proceed.

Once the class action is authorized, it is expected to proceed to pre-trial examination, requests for documents and preparation of expert reports, added Asselin. At that point, dates can be set for trial. Asselin said it was difficult to put a timeline on the whole process, but a rough guess would be two to three years.

“What is absolutely certain is that we will push the file as much as possible because we know that the matter is urgent,” she said.

Greenpeace Canada said it supported Environnement Jeunesse in its effort. “No one should be surprised that today’s youth are demanding greater action to protect the planet they will inherit,” said spokeswoman Loujain Kurdi.

“Governments have acted far too slowly so we must now use all possible means, including lawsuits, to launch a true transition to a low-carbon economy. In 2030, I’ll be in my 40s, and a child who is 10 years old today will enter adulthood and be forced to live with more extreme weather.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend