The World’s Biggest Health Organization Just Told Millions of Women It’s Not Safe to Get Pregnant

Of course, it’s not always their choice.

<a href="">Alexander Lukatskiy</a>/Shutterstock

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The World Health Organization is recommending that women and couples living in areas with widespread Zika infection should delay getting pregnant in order to avoid the risk that their babies will be born with congenital brain defects the virus can cause.

The WHO’s statement on Tuesday—which aligns with the policies of five Latin American countries and Puerto Rico—will affects millions of reproductive-aged people in the 46 countries where Zika is likely to spread. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—which has advised pregnant Americans, and those trying to conceive, not to travel to Zika-plagued areas—25 percent of Puerto Rico’s 3.5 million population will have been infected with Zika by year’s end. (Scientists, however, are not expecting widespread outbreaks in the continental United States.)

Leaders of Zika-plagued nations tell women to avoid pregnancy, but such decrees ignore certain realities.

Spread by mosquitoes of the Aedes genus—and sometimes by having sex with an infected person—the virus is generally harmless in adults. In the infants of infected mothers, however, scientists have measured high rates of microcephaly—a disorder characterized by an unusually small head and severe brain damage.

But as I reported in January, avoiding pregnancy is nearly impossible for many of the women living where Zika is worst. That’s because Latin American and Caribbean countries, where 58 percent of pregnancies are unintended, have some of the harshest and most restrictive reproductive health laws in the world. The cost of contraception is too high, and clinics too far out of reach, for many—and adolescent girls, who may avoid contraception due to the cultural stigma of being sexual active—account for one-fifth of births. In addition, estimated 1.6 million women are raped each year in Latin America. Add to that the fact that abortion is restricted and even banned in many places.

“Even if a woman is convinced by the government’s messages, she might still get pregnant unintentionally,” Carmen Barroso, the regional director of a Planned Parenthood affiliate, told me. “What the government should be doing, besides combating the virus, of course, is they should make it easier for women to avoid pregnancies they don’t want.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend