Which Fast-Food Kids’ Meal Is the Healthiest?

We tested 10 different ones to find out—and some of the results were pretty unbelievable.

Meals for “moderately active” preschoolers—kids between two and five—should contain about 410 calories (slightly less for kids on the younger end of that range and slightly more for the older ones), according to USDA recommendations (PDF).

Yet when we looked at kids’ meals from 10 different fast-food chains, we found that all of them contained more than the recommended amount of calories—and some contained much more. The most caloric, from Carl’s Jr., had a whopping 990 calories, more than twice what a preschooler should be eating (and about 33 percent more than what’s recommended for a 10-year-old). The least caloric was KFC’s Li’l Bucket, with 570 calories.

Here’s what a Carl’s Jr. Kids’ Meal looks like—and how it would look at 410 calories:

Carls Jr photo

Photos by Brett Brownell

To find out how the others stacked up—and to learn how to make a healthy, kid-friendly meal in 10 minutes or less—check out the video at the top of this post. (The 410-calorie portions shown in the video are approximate, not exact.)

When we asked the fast food companies to comment on their kids’ meals’ high calorie counts, many noted that it’s possible to select a meal that adds up to 400 calories or less from their kids’ menus. For example, a Burger King representative wrote in an email:

To clarify, our kids meals are under 400 calories when selecting the following options for lunch and dinner: entrée + apple slices + fat free milk and provides 1 serving of fruit + 1 serving of dairy. If a parent chooses French fries and soda or soft serve instead of apple slices and fat free milk, the calories can reach more than 600.

But Jennifer Harris, a social scientist with Yale’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, points out that customers don’t always opt for the healthiest combination. “When you bring in a younger kid, it’d be hard to get them interested in the apple slices, even if they are there,” she says. “Even if you show apples and milk on the ads, once the kid gets in there, they are going to be smelling French fries and wanting that.”

A Rudd Center report found that between 2010 and 2013, while there was a 54 percent increase in the overall number of kids’ meals available at 18 different fast-food restaurants, the percentage of kids’ menu items that qualified as healthy—less than 1 percent—remained the same.

The researchers noted that fast food companies spent $4.6 billion on marketing to kids in 2012. Harris points out that many fast-food chains’ advertising appeals to preschoolers. “The companies say they are not targeting kids this young, that they are actually targeting 6- to 11-year-olds,” she says. But toddlers watch a lot of television. “McDonald’s has ads with dinosaurs and animated farms. That’s perfect for really young kids.”

Here’s a quick look at the calorie counts for the kids’ meals at the 10 fast-food restaurants we visited:

And for comparison, here’s the falafel meal that we made in the video:



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend