America’s Top 10 Polluters

The EPA releases a database of greenhouse gas sources. Is there a global warmer in your backyard?

It just got a whole lot easier for Americans to find out which power plants and industrial sites are releasing the most planet-baking emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday released its greenhouse gas database, and included some cool tools for tracking polluters.

The database includes the largest sources—the 6,700 power plants and heavy industries that are responsible for 80 percent of all emissions in the United States. It covers their emissions for 2010, the first year they were required to report to the EPA. The inventory, which we’ve written about before, is really just an exercise in taking stock and disclosing emissions. It doesn’t include any requirements to reduce those emissions. But it could be a first step in that direction.

For one, the database makes it clear who is releasing the emissions, and how much. Citizens can see who the big polluters are in their area. Local papers can report on it. Maybe it will even spark some healthy competition between facilities to reduce their cut back—like The Biggest Loser, for power plants. Or it could be used to shame companies whose emissions keep going up. This is basically what happened with an earlier database, called the Toxics Release Inventory. In the 1980s, it was created to track nasty emissions, which companies began cutting even before mandatory reductions were phased in. After all, no one wants to be called out publicly for farting at the party, so to speak.

The inventory includes carbon dioxide emissions (CO2), as well as other greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide. These are the gases that scientists say are trapping heat in the atmosphere and causing the planet to warm up. This is the first time the agency has compiled site-specific emission figures for all all major sources, including power plants, refineries, chemical plants, and landfills.

Here are some of the biggest sources of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States.

Scherer coal plant in Juliette, Georgia. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 22,978,929 CO2e. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Bowen coal plant in Cartersville, Georgia. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 21,026,397 CO2e. Source: lndhslf72/Flickr

Miller coal plant in Quinton, Alabama. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 20,752,490 CO2e. Source: Dystopos/Flickr

Martin Lake coal plant in Tatum, Texas. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 18,701,286 CO2e. Source: Google Maps

Gibson coal plant in Owensville, Indiana. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 17,993,350 CO2e. Source: Duke Energy/Flickr

Monroe coal plant in Monroe, Michigan. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 17,850,341 CO2e. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Labadie coal plant in Labadie, Missouri. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 17,365,003 CO2e. Source: David Herholz/Flickr

Colstrip coal plant in Colstrip, Montana. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 17,120,416 CO2e. Source: ambib/Flickr

Gen J M Gavin coal plant in Cheshire, Ohio. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 16,872,856 CO2e. Source: Jeff Lovett/Flickr

Rockport coal plant in Rockport, Indiana. Total greenhouse gas emissions: 16,666,035 CO2e. Source: Brett Ciccotelli/Flickr



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend