Not Enough Fish in the Sea

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Overfishing means catching fish faster than they can reproduce. Overfishing pushes the fish population lower and lower, until fish are so few that fishermen can’t make a living any more. Many fisheries have already collapsed.

In the second half of the 20th century, ocean fishermen increased their catch 400% by doubling the number of boats and using more effective fishing gear. In 1989, the world’s catch leveled off at just over 82 million metric tons of fish per year, which is all the ocean can produce.

Overfishing affects the marine ecosystems in which species are embedded. Scientists warn that this will result in profound changes in our oceans, perhaps changing them forever. (Source: Greenpeace, Monterey Bay Aquarium.)

The graphic below illustrates the current status (as of 2001) of fish stocks. For a graphic illustrating the effects of overfishing, see here. And for one showing the challenge of rebuilding depleted fish stocks, see here.

Overfishing chart

Back to The Last Days of the Ocean project index

Back to Julia Whitty’s feature story, “The Fate of the Ocean”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest