Rocky Mountain High

<a href="">snowstice</a>/Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Colorado on Tuesday night became the first state in the nation to legalize recreational marijuana, beating out Washington by about an hour.

Barring a legal challenge, anyone over the age of 21 can soon walk into a marijuana dispensary in the Rocky Mountain State and buy some bud—and not the kind made by Anheuser-Busch.

But the fight for legal weed in Colorado and around the country is far from over. Cracking down on pot is still a centerpiece of federal drug enforcement policy, and the feds may try to quash Colorado’s legal weed program before it gets started.

Take for example the experience of medical marijuana dispensaries in California, which, until now, has been seen as the leader of the marijuana movement. Two years ago, the Proposition 19 ballot initiative to legalize pot for those without a prescription fizzled in the face of withering attacks from law enforcement. Starting last year, the Department of Justice reversed its pledge to leave Golden State medical pot dispensaries alone, moving to shut down reputable outfits such as the Harborside Health Center in Oakland. So far, outcry from pot advocates and sympathetic politicos hasn’t caused them to back off.

Still, pot advocates say the experience in Colorado could be different. “Nobody knows what’s gong to happen,” says Tom Angell, a spokesperson for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, “but I think if you see marijuana legalization getting more votes than either of the presidential candidates, which looks like a distinct possibility, and a number of states acting on this—Colorado and Washington—I think the political calculus begins to change. It is becoming a reality that nobody can deny.”

In a possible sign that the feds might come around to legal weed, US Attorney General Eric Holder declined to formally oppose the state’s legalization initiative, known as Amendment 64. In 2010, he opposed California’s Prop. 19.

And unlike in California, the federal government hasn’t raided Colorado marijuana dispensaries that comply with state and local laws. While that could be because Colorado is less high-profile than California, it also might be a product of the state’s more coherent regulatory system. (California mostly leaves medical pot regs up to individual cities). “I think the federal government has been more respectful of Colorado’s marijuana system because it is state and locally regulated,” says Mason Tvert, a spokesman for the Yes on 64 campaign. “So the federal government has not felt the need to interfere.”

To be sure, the Golden State deserves credit for seeding the idea that legalization isn’t just crazy talk. But Colorado also has a long history of progressivism when it comes to bucking the Puritans. Exactly 80 years ago, it legalized alcohol—well before the federal government ended prohibition. Amendment 64 wisely leaves the job of devising a regulatory system for legal weed up to the state legislature. It won’t be an easy task, but activists think they can pull it off. “We can show the rest of the nation that when you legalize marijuana, the sky does not fall,” Angell says. “That is can be safer and at the same time you can collect more tax money.” Call it the pot stimulus.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend