Quick Quiz: Who Wants to Revive Firing Squads?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mwichary/3408600898/sizes/l/in/photostream/">Flickr/Marcin Wichery</a>

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Florida Sen. Brad Drake (R-Okaloosa) has filed a bill in Tallahassee to make the state’s killing of criminals more visceral: He’d do away with lethal injection, giving capital convicts the choice of getting electrocuted or being shot. Saying he’s “sick and tired of this sensitivity movement for criminals,” Drake has vowed to bring back the state’s old electric chair, an apparatus in the Central Florida-based Starke prison known as “Old Sparky.” (It was abandoned in 2000 after it had difficulty killing one prisoner with the usual jolt, then set another prisoner’s face on fire.)

Here’s a way to put this story in perspective: Below are three quotes about killing inmates in Florida. One of them isn’t Drake discussing his capital-punishment proposal. Can you guess which one it is? Answer (and source) at the end:

1. “There shouldn’t be anything controversial about a .45-caliber bullet. If it were up to me we would just throw them off the Sunshine Skyway bridge and be done with it.”‘

2. “In the words of Humphrey Bogart, ‘Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.’ I am so tired of being humane to inhumane people.”

3. “You know, they ought to just put them in the electric chair or line them up in front of a firing squad.”

ANSWER: Okay, sort of a trick question. Drake didn’t say that last one, but one of his constituents did, in a meeting with Drake at a Waffle House, and that’s how he got his inspiration for the bill. Nos. 1 and 2 were part of Drake’s defense of the bill, as reported by the Florida Current. Of course, Humphrey Bogart did not say “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn”; Clark Gable did. But why be such a stickler for facts when life and death are on the line?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest