Vitter Blames Immigrants for Louisiana’s Census Problems

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), who was recently (and inexplicably) re-elected after a scandal involving prostitution and an alleged diaper fetish, knows who to blame for Louisiana’s recent loss of a congressional seat in post-Census reapportionment: illegal immigrants in other states. He’s definitely on to something here. Surely Louisiana’s slower population growth relative to other states couldn’t have anything to do with a certain hurricane that devastated the state’s biggest city and drove a large portion of the black population out of the state entirely—making Vitter’s road to re-election this year that much easier. No, it’s definitely the fault of illegal immigrants. Here’s what Vitter told Politico:

“Louisiana stands to lose clout in Congress, while states that welcome illegal immigrants stand to unfairly benefit from artificially inflated population totals,” the Republican senator said in a statement Tuesday.

Politico notes that Louisiana “also” lost residents due to Hurricane Katrina, and reminds readers of Vitter’s failed 2009 effort to try to force a question about citizenship onto the census questionnaire. What the paper doesn’t mention, however, is that Vitter is really complaining about the Constitution, which mandates that the Census count “persons” (and 3/5 of every slave), not just “citizens.” So sorry, Senator: to fix this “problem” of yours, you’re probably going to need a constitutional amendment. Of course, it might be easier to save Louisiana’s extra congressional district if you built a time machine and went back to tell your Republican friend George W. Bush not to gut the Federal Emergency Management Agency and urge him not to hand its reins to the failed, fired head of the International Arabian Horse Association. Just a thought. 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend