Can The Pope Be Impeached?

Pope Benedict XVI | Flickr/<a href="">letdown102</a> (<a href="">Creative Commons</a>).

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In recent weeks, the firestorm over sexual abuse of children by Catholic clergymen has reached even the pope himself.

The New York Times reported last week that Pope Benedict XVI was copied on a memo explaining that a priest who abused children would be reassigned to work with kids. The priest later abused again, and while the Vatican denies that the pope had any knowledge of the situation, the pontiff has come in for a barrage of criticism. Could the pope be impeached?

No. There’s no procedure in church law that allows for a pope to be impeached. It’s an open-and-shut case, Watson.

The pope has what is probably the world’s safest job. It’s essentially impossible to dislodge him without his consent. Even if he’s sick or otherwise incapacitated, he’s still the pope until he says otherwise. Theoretically, a pope can resign—and some of Benedict’s critics have urged him to do so. But it’s unlikely that this will happen. Canon law requires that any resignation be “freely made and properly manifested.” The last pope to step down from the post was Gregory XII, in 1415.

(The Catholic Encyclopedia notes that “it is well known that Pope Pius VII (1800-23), before setting out for Paris to crown Napoleon in 1804, had signed an abdication of the papal throne to take effect in case he were imprisoned in France.”)

Even if there were an impeachment procedure, it’s unlikely that it would ever be invoked. The institutional church’s response to the current media onslaught has been to rally around the pope. Prominent bishops are embracing and praising Benedict, not distancing themselves from him. Instead of responding to the issues raised by the Times‘ report, Benedict has so far refused to address it. Meanwhile, conservative Catholics and the Vatican’s official newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, have argued that the Times series is part of a media vendetta against the pope. The media are acting “with the clear and ignoble intent of trying to strike Benedict and his closest collaborators at any cost,” the paper wrote.

The very idea of impeaching the pope is somewhat inconsistent with Catholic theology. According to the church, the pope is the “Vicar of Christ” on earth, the successor of Saint Peter. Doctrine does not say the pope is always infallible (that’s a common misconception)—but he’s rarely, if ever, challenged by other important members of the Catholic hierarchy. Sorry, impeachment fans: This one’s a non-starter.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend